A patient told me she couldn’t get over a guy she’d been seeing.
He was no good for her. He didn’t even seem to want to go out with her. But she couldn’t let go.
“But I love him,” she explained.
Well, in a manner of speaking.
She was in love with him like a child – the way a child loves a parent.
A child’s love is based upon dependency. A child loves whoever takes care of him, because he cannot take care of himself.
When a young child says “I love you,” he means “I worship you and you are all-powerful and I depend upon you utterly and you are everything and I couldn’t survive without you.”
It’s the same way religious people relate to their chosen god-objects. It’s no coincidence they often kneel before statues or altars and refer to “Lord” and “Almighty” and “Heavenly Father,” and so on.
If you live in an island with a volcano and it erupts and burns down your village, you can respond as an adult, and take up volcanology research. Or you can regress under the stress into a child, and talk to the volcano as a parent-object, asking what you did wrong to make it angry, and trying to please it.
A child is so utterly dependent upon a parent that, if he displeases the parent, he will always locate the fault within. He will not think – oh, it’s just a volcano, they erupt sometimes. It must be about the child, something he did – his fault.
My client was relating to the guy she was dating the same way. And she was beating herself up pretty bad.
Adult love is very different from child love. It begins with loving yourself.
Then you add three ingredients:
Attraction, Trust, and Respect.
That’s what it means to love someone else, romantically, as an adult.
1. You are attracted to him. This is simple enough. The common mistake here is trying to ignore sexual attraction and turn a friendship into a romantic relationship. You cannot go out with the guy you SHOULD go out with. You have to go out with the guy you WANT to go out with. “But he’s so nice” is not a reason to date someone. You have to be into him, too.
2. You trust him. If someone values you, his attention is focused on you. Monogamy is the clearest manifestation of a mutual fascination. But even in the early months of dating, before monogamy enters the picture, trust is already an issue.
Are you worried he might not call?
You shouldn’t be. You should trust his interest in you. If you don’t, there’s probably something wrong. If you value yourself, you will find someone who values you as well. And if he values you, he won’t leave you wondering if he’s going to call.
3. You respect him. The best relationships contain a note of mutual awe. You think your partner is pretty darned terrific – and he returns the compliment.
Happy partnerships are a bit mysterious – they are secret clubs, with only two members. We don’t know what Napoleon saw in Josephine, or Gertrude saw in Alice B, or John saw in Yoko – but these famous partners were clearly fascinated with their spouses, and their fascination was returned.
A mature, respectful relationship between equals might seem pretty dull stuff compared to the headlong thrill of worshipping a parent-object like a child.
Yes, it is a bit calmer. Far less drama.
But believe me, it has its pleasures.













In Lennon’s case, it isn’t difficult to see the basis for the pattern. All Lennon fans know the familiar facts:
The pattern is hard to miss: abandonment to nurturing to abandonment – back and forth and back and forth. Lennon lost his father, but had his mother. Then lost his mother. Then had his mother again. Then lost her again. She adored him, but couldn’t keep him – so back he went to Aunt Mimi. Then she adored him again, but died suddenly, leaving him utterly bereft and as afraid to trust love in any form as he longed for the love he’d once cherished.
The borderline pattern is usually handed from parent to child. The parent exhibits this switch from one extreme to the other, and the child, attempting to adapt in response, begins to gyrate, too. In Lennon’s case, the events of his childhood were extreme, involving actual abandonment and the sudden death of a parent – so his pattern was particularly pronounced. By all accounts, John could be a very difficult person to deal with. His son Julian makes that clear in describing his few memories of his father, and even Sean, who barely knew his father, described him as having a strong temper and behaving unpredictably – affectionate sometimes, cruel and angry at others. The man who wrote “All You Need is Love” was indeed warm and loving and sincere and idealistic. He could also be vicious. That was the fearful child in John, fighting, unconsciously, to survive in a world fraught with the peril of abandonment and betrayal.
If I worked with John Lennon, I would seek meticulously to be the same stable object each and every time he saw me. I would let him know I welcomed his anger just as I welcomed all his emotions, so long as he put everything into words instead of going into action on unexplored feeling. I would make certain he never received a response from me other than acceptance and support. The goal at all times would be to flatten out the gyrations – to offer a Middle Path, the path of the Buddha, the path of moderation.
I would make sure Lennon knew I wasn’t like the people in his childhood. I would be there, the same old People’s Therapist, each and every time – offering support and understanding.










